Huerta del Valle Ruben Valencia Ontario City Council

Monday – September 18, 2017

Several months ago, when we turned in our grading plan, we hit the first major roadblock to the project from the planning department. Karen Thompson said that planning hadn’t been taking the project seriously until now– they failed to raise a number of zoning concerns early in the project. During our first meeting with planning, we got verbal approval from the director of the planning department, Scott, to go ahead and submit plans. The educational center hasn’t changed in design significantly then. The issue of several of the structures lying on property lines was never brought up before, nor were codes brought up which prevent assembly uses at the garden. Needless to say, this dealt a moral blow to me personally and we were at a loss of how to proceed. Meanwhile, I was finishing my senior project for school. Eventually, we got in contact with Michael Dieden of Creative Housing Associates, who agreed to mentor us pro-bono on how to navigate the political process which is the only possible option for getting the center built in the same scale and function as we had envisioned. Since then the city has tried to negotiate to only build the shade structure and amphitheater. We started investigating our limited options as the worst case scenario doesn’t exactly do justice to three years’ work of many, many people.

Several months pass…

We met with Ruben Valencia yesterday, Ontario’s City Council member. We talked over a booklet of the programs the garden offers as well as the renderings of the project and precedents. Maria and Arthur talked about what can be done to work closer with the city and better integrate the programs. I had the impression that he had spoken prior to planning before this meeting. Although completely supportive, he talked about zoning and lot lines in the same terms as planning. Specifically he said that it wouldn’t be fair to allow certain uses on the site that others aren’t able to do on the R-2 lots. Funnily enough, no part of the center is permitted in R-2 as it has public uses. The master plan hadn’t changed at all since two years ago, and only last spring the city started raising zoning issues.

Ruben hinted that we could look at getting a variance, but also said that he is limited to what he can do as a council member as they are prevented from micro-managing projects, and it is looked down upon. When I asked if he could make a meeting happen with the directors of building and planning departments and us, he said that might be unfair treatment. Instead, he gave us the contact information of his appointee, a landscape architect working for the city. We are currently arranging a meeting with the landscape architect, Reyes Fausto.
Larry Schlossberg, an architect at Gruen Associates to whom we reached out through Michael Dieden of Creating Housing Associates, wrote to us what we must get out of the consequent meeting with Fausto Reyes: “You need to determine what sort of entitlement you need: variance, zone change etc. Ontario may have some entitlement mechanism that I am not aware of. Then you need to determine what the entitlement process is. Is there an application, public hearings etc? The city will have a process which will need to be followed. The zoning regulations can not be causally waived by anybody. Maybe the existing land use agreement can be amended”.
On an unrelated note, we ran into Corinna Gebert, an architect who designed the farmPOD for Root Down LA through an Open Architecture Collaborative event. Corinna kindly provided the images above as courtesy for us to use as precedent in our presentation.
Currently Necils and I are working on updating the construction set a little bit so that it’s in the best possible shape for the meeting with Fausto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *